Templates
Anonymized field-feedback report
Publication status
- Report ID and version:
- Review status: draft / reviewed / withdrawn
- Organization type and sector:
- Country or regulatory context at a non-identifying level:
- Observation period:
- Independent reviewer:
- Publication date:
Evidence boundary
- Direct observation / internal measurement / interview / survey / vendor report:
- Who collected the evidence and for what purpose:
- System and workflow version:
- Baseline, denominator, sample, and missing cases:
- Raw evidence location and authorized reviewers:
- Personal, confidential, security-sensitive, or identifying details removed:
Preregistered transferred hypothesis
- Public source IDs or local hypothesis:
- Frozen snapshot version, UTC timestamp, and task-time registry version:
- Pre-pilot status: transferred measurement / adjusted hypothesis / local hypothesis:
- Transfer contract: task profile, work mode, architecture, exact A0–A4 action boundary, quality threshold, and experience level:
- Comparability and required adjustments:
- Planned manual minutes per case, cases per month, and eligible share:
- Exact net low, central, and high ranges per eligible case and across the whole workload:
- Retained human work: preparation, supervision, verification, correction, exception rate, and minutes per exception:
- Setup hours, amortization period, and calculated minutes per eligible case:
What happened
- Original process and problem:
- Work mode, architecture, exact A0–A4 action boundary, and permissions:
- Pilot protocol and preregistered thresholds:
- Observed business outcome:
- Total baseline human minutes for every observed case:
- Total human minutes with AI for every observed case, including rejected, failed, excluded, escalated, corrected, fallback, and missing cases:
- Observed whole-workload result and position below / within / above the range:
- Explanation for the gap between hypothesis and observation:
- Hypothesis to retain, narrow, widen, or remove:
- Recalibrated snapshot as a separate version, or reason none was created:
- Reliability by critical segment:
- Incidents, near misses, corrections, and withdrawals:
- Decision taken and by whom:
Transfer limits
- Population and workflows represented:
- Contexts not represented:
- Dependencies and implementation effort:
- Conditions required to reproduce the result:
- Claims this report does not support:
- Earliest reassessment date:
Publication review
- No personal data or re-identification key
- No client, supplier, or employee identity without explicit authority
- No secrets, exploitable security details, or privileged material
- Observation is distinguished from estimate and opinion
- Hypothesis and range were frozen before field results were read
- Extrapolation, observation, and recalibration retain distinct evidence statuses
- Failures and excluded cases are not removed from the denominator
- Supplier claims are labelled as supplier claims
- Transfer limits are prominent
- Publication authority and withdrawal contact are recorded
Short finding suitable for the public index:
To print or save as PDF: Ctrl+P (⌘P on Mac).
Source and history · GitHub